More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Alberta judge to rule on ex-justice minister’s threat mid-trial to sue witness

Sauvageau is suing the province for $7.6 million in lost wages and benefits after her contract was not renewed in 2014.

 
PHOTO: EDMONTON AB. JANUARY 28, 2014- Dr. Anny Sauvageau Chief Medical Examiner. Alberta’s Child Intervention Panel is hosting a two-day roundtable to debate Alberta's child death review system and publication ban at Lister Hall at the University of Alberta. PHOTO BY SHAUGHN BUTTS/EDMONTON JOURNAL
 
 
 
EDMONTON — A judge who is to rule on a defamation threat sent in the middle of a civil trial by Alberta’s former justice minister has been told the warning reignited fear and anxiety in the plaintiff and led another witness to beg off testifying.

“It’s not going to be easy to put the toothpaste back in the tube,” lawyer Allan Garber told Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Doreen Sulyma on Monday.

“A mistrial would not be in anyone’s best interests, but I do want to say this has been difficult.”

Sulyma is to deliver a ruling in the matter Wednesday morning. There are various possible outcomes, including a finding of contempt.

Garber represents Dr. Anny Sauvageau, Alberta’s former chief medical examiner. Sauvageau is suing the province for $7.6 million in lost wages and benefits after her contract was not renewed in 2014.

Jonathan Denis was Alberta’s justice minister at the time.

Sauvageau had been testifying before Sulyma over the past few days in the civil trial.

The process slammed to a halt Friday after it was revealed a representative for Denis had sent a letter threatening to sue her for defamation tied to comments she was making on the witness stand.

However, those testifying in court have full immunity from defamation in order to compel the whole, unvarnished truth.

Sauvageau, in an affidavit, said she has never defamed Denis.

Garber told court the letter doesn’t detail the alleged defamation and “should be interpreted as a threat to the plaintiff and an attempt to intimidate the plaintiff to protect the reputation of Mr. Denis.”

He added that after news of Friday’s letter was published in the media, a potential witness said he no longer wished to testify.

Brendan Miller, a lawyer for Denis, told the judge that the letter was not well drafted and was poorly timed, coming in the middle of the court case.

But Miller stressed the letter was misinterpreted.

He agreed it’s a well-understood legal principle that testimony in court cases can’t be used for defamation lawsuits.

But he noted such testimony can be used to help identify and corroborate similar statements made outside court. And that, said Miller, was what the letter was doing: cautioning Sauvageau over comments she may be making to media outside court.

“There should be no fear whatsoever for the doctor to testify,” said Miller.

Garber told court he had no idea what Miller was talking about.

“There’s no reference anywhere (in the letter) to (Sauvageau) having said anything to the media — and she’s never done that,” he said.

Miller said Denis, who was present in court Monday, was sorry for problems the letter had caused. Sauvageau was also in court, on the opposite side of the public gallery from Denis.

The letter was written by lawyer Kyle Shewchuk on behalf of Denis. As the proceedings closed Monday, Shewchuk stood and apologized to Sulyma.

“This has been a learning experience for me, as I’m a new lawyer to the bar,” said Shewchuk.

The trial revolves around Sauvageau’s performance as chief medical examiner, a job she held from 2011 to the end of 2014.

Sauvageau alleges she was forced out of the job as punishment after raising concerns, including political interference in cases and billing on body pickups.

The government, in turn, says Sauvageau’s contract was not renewed because she was seeking to exercise authority beyond the scope of her job while displaying questionable judgment and decision making.

Claims from either side have yet to be proven in court.

Sauvageau said in her affidavit that the letter from Denis’s lawyer has had a chilling effect because she does not have a job and fears the “financial consequences” of fighting a defamation lawsuit.

“I am now fearful to give my evidence in this trial,” wrote Sauvageau.


 
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Latest News

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed