More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Family home includes full parcel of land: Saskatchewan Court of Appeal

Lower court's valuation included only house and yard site for equal division.

 
PHOTO: Stock
 
 
 

The whole land parcel on which a house stands comprises the family home for purposes of valuation in a divorce proceeding, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled.

The whole land parcel on which a house stands comprises the family home for purposes of valuation in a divorce proceeding, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled.

In Tysseland v. Tysseland, 2022 SKCA 39, the appellant woman and the respondent man started living together in late 1993. They first resided in a farmhouse, then bought a townhouse with the intention of making it their family home. They married in 1997 and began living in the townhouse.

In 1998, the man told the woman that their relationship was over and he returned to live on the farm with his father. After that point, the parties intermittently lived together throughout their tumultuous relationship. After his father died in 2001, the man inherited the land and its improvements, including the farmhouse and the quarter section where it stood.

The man petitioned for divorce in 2015 after he separated from the woman for the last time. The trial judge made the following findings, among others.

  • The farmhouse, not the townhouse, was the parties’ family home
  • The parties were entitled to an equal division of the value of the farmhouse and the yard site where it was located
  • As for the other land and property inherited from the father, the man should receive 75 percent of the value, while the woman should get 25 percent
  • The man should pay the woman, as a bottom line, an equalization payment of $456,517
  • The woman should get monthly spousal support of $350, retroactive to July 2015.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the woman’s appeal to a certain extent. The appellate court made the following adjustments to the lower court’s judgment:

  • The family home’s valuation should be adjusted to $539,000 from $275,000
  • The home quarter should be excluded from the family property subject to an unequal distribution
  • Regarding certain items of family property to which the trial judge did not refer, the hopper-bottom bins and aeration fans should be valued at $11,000 and $7,200 respectively.

In line with these changes, the appellate court ordered the adjustment of the bottom line of the equalization payment that the trial judge ordered.

The appeal court agreed that the trial judge failed to value or account for some assets in his inventory of the family property. With respect to the family home’s valuation, the trial judge should have considered the full home quarter as being the family home and should not have limited the family home to the yard site, the appellate court ruled.

The past decisions of the Saskatchewan Court of Queen’s Bench consistently proceeded on the basis that the family home should include the whole home quarter, the appellate court noted. In addition, the parties in this case treated the home quarter as a single unit.

 
 

 
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.

Latest News

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed