More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Historic land title case is about reconciliation and justice, lawyer for First Nation says

B.C. Supreme Court judge to determine if Nuchatlaht First Nation occupied disputed land in 1846.


PHOTO: Nuchatlaht First Nation elder and councillor Archie Little, centre, and Tyee Ha'with (Chief) Jordan Michael, far left, stand with supporters outside B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver on Monday before the start of their Indigenous land title case. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck)


A lawyer for a tiny First Nation in B.C. kicked off the opening day of a historic Aboriginal land title trial Monday by calling on the judge overseeing the case to give his clients the justice they have been denied for centuries.

Jack Woodward told B.C. Supreme Court Justice Elliott Myers that even the Crown’s experts agree the ancestors of the Nuchatlaht First Nation have been living off the west coast of Vancouver Island since at least the late 1700s.

Woodward said the questions the judge has to decide are as much about how to reconcile Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Canadians as they are about the details of a dispute over a 200-square-kilometre piece of land.

“The function of this court is reconciliation,” Woodward said during his opening submissions.

“By the end of this trial, we have a huge intellectual project ahead of us. This case is not about the facts. This case is about grappling with these difficult legal concepts and doing justice for my clients.”

‘Mischief-making on the part of the province’

The Nuchatlaht are seeking Aboriginal title over an area of Crown land 300 kilometres northwest of Victoria, mostly made up of Nootka Island and much of the surrounding coastline.

The First Nation is the first to make a claim according to the terms of a groundbreaking three-part test set by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2014 to establish Aboriginal title.

This map depicts the traditional lands claimed by the Nuchatlaht First Nation on the west coast of Vancouver Island as part of a lawsuit for Aboriginal title. (CBC News)

To meet that standard, the Nuchatlaht must prove they occupied the land exclusively in 1846 — when the British claimed sovereignty through a treaty resulting in the present-day boundary between Canada and the United States.

Woodward told the judge his clients have done everything they can to make their application for title as legally simple as possible — excluding private land or anything that might conflict with federal interests like lighthouses.

The lawyer accused the province of falsely suggesting that the Nuchatlaht are trying to lay stake to territory claimed by other Indigenous groups. 

Woodward said the claim was drawn up with the express goal of avoiding any overlap.

“The [Nuchatlaht] have carefully chosen a claim area that avoids any conflict with neighbouring tribes,” he said.

“By the end of the case and upon hearing the relevant legal principles, the court will find that any attempt to stir up the spectre of a dispute with neighbours is mischief-making on the part of the province.”

Lawyers for the province have yet to make their arguments in court.

In documents filed in response to the claim, the Crown alleges that prior to the time the British asserted sovereignty over the area the First Nation are claiming, the Nuchatlaht were a “relatively small and relatively weak association of groups” that had been “displaced from areas outside the claim area by other Indigenous peoples.”

“There are not now and for many years there have not been Nuchatlaht resident communities in the claim area,” the response reads.

Evidence land was cultivated

The trial is expected to last at least 59 days.

Woodward said the proceedings will include testimony from a variety of expert witnesses who can speak to the history and cultural makeup of the Nuchatlaht.

He said the trial will hear from an ethnobotanist whose groundbreaking research will contradict Eurocentric stereotypes that paint Indigenous people as strictly hunters and gatherers.

Lawyer Jack Woodward, seen here in 2017, is representing the Nuchatlaht First Nation. (Tristan Le Rudulier/CBC)

“She has found places in the claim area that show that human beings cultivated the land in order to grow species of plants that were useful,” Woodward told the judge.

To that end, the lawyer said the expert had found evidence that the Nuchatlaht grew crabapples.

Woodward claimed that the Crown and the Nuchatlaht agree on many elements of the dispute — starting with the fact that the First Nation was in possession of the claim area in 1846.

He suggested there was enough common ground for Myers to make a declaration of Aboriginal title already — without declaring any boundaries, leaving it to both parties to negotiate the limits of the claim.

The judge declined.

The Nuchatlaht case also promises to be significant because it’s the first to come to court since the province passed legislation in 2019 to align its laws with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

Article 26 of the declaration specifically states that “Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.”

Experts say it is uncertain how the commitment to UNDRIP will play into the province’s arguments and the judge’s considerations.

Jason Proctor


Jason Proctor is a reporter in British Columbia for CBC News and has covered the B.C. courts and mental health issues in the justice system extensively.


Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.

Latest News


Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


Instagram Feed