More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Judge clears way for class-action lawsuit against Facebook to proceed to B.C. Supreme Court

A Victoria woman representing a class-action lawsuit alleging that Facebook used people’s likenesses in sponsored stories without their consent will have her case heard in B.C. Supreme Court.

PHOTO: Stock
A Victoria woman representing a class-action lawsuit alleging that Facebook used people’s likenesses in sponsored stories without their consent will have her case heard in B.C. Supreme Court.

In a video conference hearing June 2, Justice Nitya Iyer ruled in favour of plaintiff Deborah Douez, allowing for a summary trial of the class-action lawsuit.

Douez launched legal action against the tech giant more than a decade ago over the sponsored stories advertising format.

She alleged her name and photos were used in sponsored stories, which were discontinued in 2014, without her consent in promotion of a company she had ‘liked’ on the social media site.

The lawsuit claims that Facebook violated B.C.’s Privacy Act in doing so, and is seeking damages of between $830 million and $2.1 billion.

“I have found for Ms. Douez on the merits of the liability common issues. Briefly, members of the class did not expressly or impliedly consent to Facebook’s use of their likenesses in Sponsored Stories,” wrote Iyer. “Facebook’s use of class members likenesses was for a purpose prohibited by the four privacy statutes.”

Facebook has argued that it never passed on user information to advertisers without consent, and that sponsors never had access to user-generated content or personal information.

“In other words, the sponsor could pay to boost a user’s story, but the sponsor did this without at any time having any form of access to the user’s boosted story or data,” the company said in its response.

However, Iyer found that sponsors may have still benefitted by associating their brands with real people and their friend groups, quoting P.T. Barnum’s famous observation that “there’s no such thing as bad publicity.”

The certification of the class-action lawsuit now means that B.C., Saskatchewan, Manitoba or Newfoundland and Labrador residents who were members of Facebook at any time between Jan. 1, 2011 and May 30, 2014 could join the legal action, given they:

(a) at any time during this period were registered with Facebook using their real name, or had a profile picture that included an identifiable self-image, or both; and

(b) had their real name, identifiable portrait, or both used by Facebook in a Sponsored Story.

A date for a summary trial has not been set.


Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Latest News


Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


Instagram Feed