More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Judge wonders if pandemic law used against Moncton protesters was ‘over-broad’

David Robert West accused of violating province's Emergency Measures Act at protest in January 2021.

PHOTO: Britney Green, left, Nicholas DeAngelis, a supporter who has assisted them, and David West leave the Moncton courthouse Tuesday morning. (Shane Magee/CBC)
A New Brunswick judge has suggested provisions of the province’s pandemic restrictions used to charge several people who took part in a protest last year may have been an overreach.

A New Brunswick judge has suggested provisions of the province’s pandemic restrictions used to charge several people who took part in a protest last year may have been an overreach.

“I believe the law might be over-broad,” Judge Luc Labonté said Tuesday morning, referring to New Brunswick’s mandatory order under the Emergency Measures Act. “And might be contrary to the charter because it captures, I believe, perhaps conduct that shouldn’t be penalized.”

Labonté made the comments as the trial of David Robert West of Riverview resumed Tuesday in Moncton.

West is accused of violating the mandatory order by attending a gathering of more than five people without wearing a mask and without being physically distanced from others on Jan. 24, 2021.

West was among five arrested and charged at the protest of pandemic rules that day outside Moncton city hall. His trial began April 13 and had adjourned after the Crown finished presenting its evidence.


An RCMP officer shown among protesters in Moncton on Jan. 24, 2021. (Guy LeBlanc/Radio-Canada)

West, who is representing himself in court with assistance from several of the others charged, stood and read a prepared statement to Labonté requesting a directed verdict.

That’s a motion used when the defence believes the Crown has failed to prove the essential elements of the offence.

West said there was no evidence people were not doing their best to stay two metres apart, no evidence whether the people were from the same household, and no evidence if people were near each other briefly or not.

The mandatory order at the time included an exemption for briefly coming closer than two metres.


RCMP officers issued tickets and arrested several people at the protest for violating the province’s emergency measures imposed to limit the spread of COVID-19. (Guy LeBlanc/Radio-Canada)

He said the word “gathering” is ambiguous and doesn’t cover a protest.

“The mandatory order in question is not applicable as it does not prohibit protests [and] demonstrations,” West said.

He called the mandatory order unlawful.

That led Labonté to ask Crown prosecutor Logan Landry several questions about the law.

The judge asked whether a family of six that gathered outside without masks would have been violating the law.

Logan said if they weren’t on private property, it would have been a violation.

The judge then laid out a similar scenario, asking about a family of six walking and then stopping in front of city hall and whether that would count as a gathering.

“Do you find that may be a bit over-broad in its reach?” Labonté said.

It wasn’t clear what Logan’s response was to the judge.

Labonté went on to suggest he believed the law may be contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. He said the onus is on West to prove that and invited the Crown to begin preparing to argue on that issue.

The judge will issue his decision on the directed verdict issue on June 29.

He if rules in West’s favour, he will be acquitted. If not, the judge said West still can call evidence and make a motion to challenge the constitutionality of the law.


Other cases on similar offence

Two of those who faced similar accusations from the protest have admitted the offence. Two

others, Nicholas DeAngelis and Britney Green, have a trial that continues Wednesday. Both have been attending court assisting West with his case.

They were charged under a section of the mandatory order introduced only days before the protest and which didn’t last very long. 

Outside the courthouse, West told reporters he believes the judge seems to be ready to rule in his favour but needs to go through the procedures first. 

“He sees what we see,” West said. “It’s a fraud, and he’s willing to expose it and I think he’s going to use us to do it and we’re happy with that.”

West is also in the midst of a separate trial on a charge alleging he violated the mandatory order by not wearing a mask at a Moncton grocery store on Dec. 31, 2020. That case resumes June 14.

Shane Magee is a Moncton-based reporter for CBC. He can be reached at


Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Latest News


Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


Instagram Feed