fbpx
  • Latest News
  • Trending News
  • All
  • Latest News
  • Featured
  • Industry News
  • Legal Governance
  • Constitutional Law
  • Op-Ed
  • News Archives
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Analysis
  • Bankruptcy Law
  • Consumer Protection Law
  • Cyber Security Law
  • Family Law
  • Disability Law
  • Employment Law
  • Environmental Law
  • Estate Law
  • Housing Law
  • Human Rights Code
  • Immigration Law
  • Insurance Law
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Privacy Law
  • Tax Law
  • Workers Compensation Board
Keeping Secrets: A Lawyer’s Obligation Not to Disclose Confidential Information to Spouses and Significant Others

Keeping Secrets: A Lawyer’s Obligation Not to Disclose Confidential Information to Spouses and Significant Others

April 20, 2022
More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report

More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report

August 13, 2022
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined

Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined

August 12, 2022
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence

The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence

August 12, 2022
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)

FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)

August 12, 2022
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent

Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent

August 11, 2022
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes

Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes

August 10, 2022
Are masking policies still valid?

Are masking policies still valid?

August 10, 2022
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

August 9, 2022
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court

Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court

August 8, 2022
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

August 3, 2022
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

August 2, 2022
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years

New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years

August 2, 2022

Defence lawyers threaten job action over Legal Aid Alberta funding

August 1, 2022
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases

The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases

July 29, 2022
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.

SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.

July 29, 2022
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again

Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again

July 29, 2022
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit

Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit

July 29, 2022

NBA investigating Philadelphia 76ers for possible tampering

July 29, 2022

#MeToo didn’t end sexual harassment in the workplace and vigilance remains a must

July 29, 2022
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid

The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid

July 28, 2022
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app

Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app

July 28, 2022
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)

Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)

July 26, 2022
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection

Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection

July 26, 2022
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit

The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit

July 26, 2022
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert

Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert

July 25, 2022

Abuse and harassment survivors ‘silenced’ by non-disclosure agreements fight for change to B.C. law

July 23, 2022
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice

The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice

July 5, 2022
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

July 4, 2022

Why your options may be limited if your employer wants you back in the workplace

July 4, 2022

City directs contractors to reinstate Sikh security guards who lost work due to clean-shaven rule

July 4, 2022
  • ABOUT LITN
  • SUPPORT LITN
  • LEGAL, PRIVACY & POLICY
  • PUBLIC EDUCATION & RESOURCE LINKS
Thursday, February 9, 2023
  • Login
  • Register for a FREE LITN account
⚖ Law in the News .com (LITN) Media 📃
  • Latest News
  • Industry News
  • Categories
    • A to C
      • Aboriginal Law
      • Access to Justice (A2J)
      • Administrative Law
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Analysis
      • Animal Law
      • Anti-Corruption Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Arbitration Law
      • Banking and Securities Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Cannibis Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action
      • Commercial Law
      • Constitutional Law
      • Construction Law
      • Consumer Protection Law
      • Contract Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber Security Law
    • D to H
      • Disability Law
      • Editor’s Choice
      • Elder Law
      • Employment Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Entertainment Law
      • Estate Law
      • Family Law
      • Highway Traffic Law
      • Housing Law
      • Human Rights Code
    • I to L
      • Immigration Law
      • Industry News
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • International Law
      • Labour Law
      • Latest News
      • Legal Governance
    • M to Z
      • Medical Law
      • Municipal Law
      • Op-Ed
      • Personal Injury Law
      • Privacy Law
      • Real Estate Law
      • Regulatory Law
      • Tax Law
      • Telecommunications Law
      • Transportation Law
      • Workers Compensation Board
  • Archives
    • 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
    • 2021
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
  • About LITN
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Mission
    • Our Goal
    • Contact Us
    • Support LITN
      • Contribute to LITN Operations
      • Place YOUR Custom Ad on LITN
      • Engage with LITN Sponsored Ads
      • Create a FREE LITN Account
      • Subscribe to the LITN Newsletter
      • Connect, Follow, Like, Retweet and Repost LITN
    • Legal, Privacy and Policy
      • Cookie Policy (CA)
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
  • Public Education and Resource Links
No Result
View All Result
⚖ Law in the News .com (LITN) Media 📃
  • Latest News
  • Industry News
  • Categories
    • A to C
      • Aboriginal Law
      • Access to Justice (A2J)
      • Administrative Law
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Analysis
      • Animal Law
      • Anti-Corruption Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Arbitration Law
      • Banking and Securities Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Cannibis Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action
      • Commercial Law
      • Constitutional Law
      • Construction Law
      • Consumer Protection Law
      • Contract Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber Security Law
    • D to H
      • Disability Law
      • Editor’s Choice
      • Elder Law
      • Employment Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Entertainment Law
      • Estate Law
      • Family Law
      • Highway Traffic Law
      • Housing Law
      • Human Rights Code
    • I to L
      • Immigration Law
      • Industry News
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • International Law
      • Labour Law
      • Latest News
      • Legal Governance
    • M to Z
      • Medical Law
      • Municipal Law
      • Op-Ed
      • Personal Injury Law
      • Privacy Law
      • Real Estate Law
      • Regulatory Law
      • Tax Law
      • Telecommunications Law
      • Transportation Law
      • Workers Compensation Board
  • Archives
    • 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
    • 2021
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
  • About LITN
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Mission
    • Our Goal
    • Contact Us
    • Support LITN
      • Contribute to LITN Operations
      • Place YOUR Custom Ad on LITN
      • Engage with LITN Sponsored Ads
      • Create a FREE LITN Account
      • Subscribe to the LITN Newsletter
      • Connect, Follow, Like, Retweet and Repost LITN
    • Legal, Privacy and Policy
      • Cookie Policy (CA)
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
  • Public Education and Resource Links
No Result
View All Result
⚖ Law in the News .com (LITN) Media 📃
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal Governance

Keeping Secrets: A Lawyer’s Obligation Not to Disclose Confidential Information to Spouses and Significant Others

In other words, a lawyer is prohibited from sharing any information about their legal work for a client at any time, with anyone.

April 20, 2022
Reading Time: 7 mins read
0
A A
0
Keeping Secrets: A Lawyer’s Obligation Not to Disclose Confidential Information to Spouses and Significant Others
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare by Email
 
PHOTO: Stock
 
  • Amy Salyzyn ⁞ SLAW
  • April 20, 2022
 
The topic of lawyer confidentiality often yields lively discussions when teaching legal ethics to law students. Some of this engagement flows from high-profile, attention-grabbing case studies like wrongful murder convictions, buried bodies, and concealed videotapes depicting horrific crimes. Even the more routine aspects of lawyer confidentiality, however, spark good conversation. For example, most students are curious about how common behaviours, like working outside the office, sending emails or using social media, may give rise to inadvertent confidentiality breaches.

The topic of lawyer confidentiality often yields lively discussions when teaching legal ethics to law students. Some of this engagement flows from high-profile, attention-grabbing case studies like wrongful murder convictions, buried bodies, and concealed videotapes depicting horrific crimes. Even the more routine aspects of lawyer confidentiality, however, spark good conversation. For example, most students are curious about how common behaviours, like working outside the office, sending emails or using social media, may give rise to inadvertent confidentiality breaches.

Another topic that often interests students is whether lawyers can talk about client matters with spouses or significant others. At the end of a stressful day, can a lawyer decompress by sharing with their spouse a challenging interaction with a client or a hard legal question posed by a case? Can a lawyer who is excited about a new retainer tell the person they are dating about their new client? Prior to a British Columbia decision from earlier this year, Lessing (Re), 2022 LSBC 6, which is discussed in more detail below, there did not appear to be any Canadian case law to guide answers to these questions.

To be sure, the wording of professional codes of conduct clearly precludes disclosure of confidential information to spouses or significant others. The relevant rule states:

A lawyer at all times must hold in strict confidence all information concerning the business and affairs of a client acquired in the course of the professional relationship and must not divulge any such information unless [certain listed exceptions apply]

(Rule 3.3-1 of the Federation of Law Societies of Canada’s Model Code of Professional Conduct)

In other words, a lawyer is prohibited from sharing any information about their legal work for a client at any time, with anyone. This general rule is subject to some narrow exceptions, none of which offer a confidentiality “free pass” for spouses or significant others. Indeed, the commentary to this rule clarifies that “a lawyer should avoid indiscreet conversations and other communications, even with the lawyer’s spouse or family, about a client’s affairs.”

But what do lawyers actually do? Do they adhere strictly to their confidentiality obligations and never talk about cases with spouses or significant others? A 2005 ABA Journal article quotes an American legal ethics scholar, saying “it’s my sense that that kind of pillow talk goes on all the time.” Aside from these sorts of anecdotal statements, however, there is little information about lawyer behaviour in this area. There appear to be no studies, for example, tracking what lawyers do (or do not) discuss with their spouses or significant others.

Moreover, this issue has not generally attracted discipline from lawyer regulators. A handful of cases exist, but, until the decision in Lessing from earlier this year, they were all from outside of Canada. For example, much media attention was paid to the 2013 disciplining of an English lawyer who told his wife’s friend that J.K. Rowling was the true author of the thriller The Cuckoo’s Calling. (Rowling had published the novel under a pseudonym, which was revealed to the world via the wife’s friend’s Twitter account after the lawyer shared the secret with her). In 2018, a lawyer couple (Thomas Holmes and Ashleigh Kerr) were disciplined by the Ohio Supreme Court for exchanging “more than a dozen e-mails in which they revealed client information to each other.” The disciplinary decision suggests that the purpose of these exchanges was to generate work efficiencies: “In general, Kerr forwarded to Holmes e-mails from her clients requesting legal documents. In response, Holmes forwarded to Kerr e-mails that he had exchanged with his clients that included similar documents he had prepared for them.” The factual contexts of these two cases take them somewhat outside a more straightforward hypothetical of a lawyer talking to a spouse about a client matter. In the English case, the lawyer did not disclose information to his wife but rather to his wife’s friend. Moreover, the involvement of a very famous client resulted in the breach becoming notorious. And the Ohio case not only involves two lawyers, but also a prolonged period of misconduct (almost two years) and the exchange of client work product to benefit the other lawyer’s practice.

The historical lack of disciplinary cases in Canada required speculation as to what approach a law society might take if a lawyer breached their duty of confidentiality by discussing client matters with a spouse or significant other. The absence of discipline did seem to suggest was this was not a priority enforcement area—regulators were not, for example, going to start proactively auditing what, exactly, lawyers were saying about their client cases at home. Moreover, absent aggravating circumstances, it seemed unlikely that lawyers would be sanctioned for such conversations even if somehow discovered. As Alice Woolley (now Justice Woolley) noted in the second edition of Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada, “A lawyer is unlikely to face any negative consequences if no harm arises from, for example, talking about a case with her intimate partner.”

The January 2022 decision in Lessing, however, provides an opportunity to test some of these assumptions. The decision, among other things, addressed confidentiality breaches arising from a lawyer sharing client emails, affidavits, and other file material with his then-spouse. The breaches were in relation to three family law clients. The material shared included sensitive medical, financial and otherwise personal information, as well as abuse allegations. These breaches came to light after the lawyer and his spouse separated and she made a complaint to the LSBC.

The lawyer admitted to sharing client information with his former spouse but claimed that his purpose “was so that she could print the documents for him on the home printer for his subsequent review.” His former spouse provided information contesting this explanation, noting, among other things, that the lawyer did not work from home, never advised her not to look at the client material and “would say to her words to the effect that ‘you have to look at this’, ‘you have to read this’ and ‘can you believe this’”. The decision also reports that, once, when emailing a client affidavit to his former spouse, the lawyer titled the email “Bedtime reading”.

The Tribunal rejected the lawyer’s explanation, finding that he “disclosed, intentionally for warped or callous purposes, the exceedingly sensitive, personal and confidential information of his clients” (para. 65). In analyzing the complaints, the Tribunal commented

Given the reference line “Bedtime reading”, and multiple instances of sending emails and affidavits or reading client files to PS, the Respondent’s actions are not accidental. Rather, the Respondent’s actions and possibly, motivations, are deeply concerning and a flagrant violation of the most private and personal confidences shared with him in his capacity as a lawyer for his clients. We note that his clients were vulnerable and going through very difficult personal experiences. The Respondent’s actions grossly betrayed the competence and compassion and respect required of him (at para 59).

The lack of evidence of specific harm to the clients involved did not preclude a finding that the lawyer committed “serious and reprehensible” professional misconduct. The Tribunal found that the lawyer’s “disclosure of confidential client information [harmed] the reputation of lawyers and the legal profession as a whole” and “[s]uch intentional disclosures erode the public confidence in lawyers, and are plainly a marked departure from the standard expected of the profession” (at para 65).

At the time of his hearing, the lawyer was a “former member” of the LSBC because of his non-payment of fees. He also had an extensive disciplinary history. In a subsequent February 2022 decision, the LSBC Tribunal declared the lawyer “ungovernable” and disbarred him. The lawyer did not appear at either the hearing involving his disbarment or the previous hearing involving his confidentiality breaches.

The Lessing decision is notable as a rare (possibly the only?) case where a Canadian law society has disciplined a lawyer for sharing client confidences with a spouse. It is also notable for confirming that, even in the absence of demonstrable harm to a client, breaching client confidentiality in such circumstances can still amount to professional misconduct.

At the same time, the significance of Lessing should not be overstated. This wasn’t an instance of a law society proactively investigating a lawyer’s practice and coming across poor practices. The complaint came to the LSBC’s door, so to speak. Moreover, as the Tribunal found, the breaches of confidentiality were not only intentional and repeated but also “for warped and callous purposes.” This case did not involve an inadvertent slip or carelessness.

Given the uniqueness of the Lessing case, it is unlikely that we will see a groundswell of similar decisions in the coming years. Nonetheless, this will be a helpful case to bring to the attention of students when discussing lawyer confidentiality in relation to spouses and significant others. Lessing is an important reminder that a lawyer’s duty to keep client confidences does not end when they are talking to their families or close confidants. Such a reminder is even more important in these pandemic years, when so many lawyers are working remotely. Home offices generate new possibilities for confidentiality breaches through overheard telephone or video conversations, open computer screens and printed documents left on desks or dining room tables. Moreover, as noted in a blog commenting on the Ohio case, “because of the increasing frequency in which we all do everything digitally…there are a number of ways that [disclosures to spouses] can surface into the light without anyone ever having a spouse voluntarily provide information any marital privilege notwithstanding.”

Ultimately, for law students and lawyers, the same general caution given prior to Lessing still holds: sharing confidential client information with a spouse or a significant other breaches the rules of professional conduct. Now, there is just an added notice that Canadian law societies can and will (in the certain cases) discipline lawyers for failing to meet their obligations in this respect.


 
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Unsubscribe from LITN instant notifications
Previous Post

Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada announces judicial appointments in the province of Ontario

Next Post

BMO customers out thousands of dollars unable to prove fraudulent e-transfers weren’t their fault

Latest News

More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Medical Law

More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report

August 13, 2022
7
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
Constitutional Law

Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined

August 12, 2022
7
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
Disability Law

The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence

August 12, 2022
7

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed

  • How #MoonMining could work ... https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/infographics/the-lunar-gold-rush-how-moon-mining-could-work ...
#spacelaw #spacelawyers #spaceeconomy #spacematters
  • 📜 Facts #FutureOfWork #RemoteWork #connectivity #wellbeing #working ... https://lawinthenews.com/
  • #LegalTechWoes #legaltech #legaltechpainpoints #legalinnovation  #legalops #legaloperations #legal
#legalgeek #legaltechs #legaltechnology | https://instagram.com/lawinthenews
Courtesy Mat Jakubowski ...silvertownlegal.com | @matjakubowski ... https://www.linkedin.com/in/mat-jakubowski | https://lawinthenews.com/

Facebook Feed

Facebook Feed

Twitter Feed

Join the Conversation

Personal selections from a Canadian perspective. #Law in the #News #LITN @Law_In_The_News

News Categories

Latest Headlines

More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report

More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report

August 13, 2022
7
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined

Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined

August 12, 2022
7
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence

The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence

August 12, 2022
7

Subscribe to the LITN Newsletter

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.

Website Powered By

DJT Design Studios logo

© 2022 Law in the News Media (LITN)

  • About LITN
  • Contact LITN
  • Support LITN
  • Legal, Privacy and Policy
  • Public Education & Resource Links
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Latest News
  • Industry News
  • Categories
    • A to C
      • Aboriginal Law
      • Access to Justice (A2J)
      • Administrative Law
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Analysis
      • Animal Law
      • Arbitration Law
      • Anti-Corruption Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Banking and Securities Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Cannibis Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action
      • Commercial Law
      • Constitutional Law
      • Construction Law
      • Consumer Protection Law
      • Contract Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber Security Law
    • D to H
      • Disability Law
      • Editor’s Choice
      • Elder Law
      • Employment Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Estate Law
      • Family Law
      • Highway Traffic Law
      • Housing Law
      • Human Rights Code
    • I to L
      • Immigration Law
      • Industry News
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • International Law
      • Labour Law
      • Latest News
      • Legal Governance
    • M to Z
      • Medical Law
      • Municipal Law
      • Op-Ed
      • Personal Injury Law
      • Privacy Law
      • Real Estate Law
      • Regulatory Law
      • Tax Law
      • Telecommunications Law
      • Transportation Law
      • Workers Compensation Board
  • News Archives
    • 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
    • 2021
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
  • Public Education & Resource Links
  • About LITN
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Mission
    • Our Goal
    • Contact LITN
    • Support LITN
    • Legal, Privacy and Policy
      • Home
      • Cookie Policy
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use Policy

© 2022 Law in the News Media (LITN)

Welcome Back to LITN!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your LITN account below.

Forgot your password? Sign Up

Create a FREE LITN Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Please complete your registration below.

*By registering into the website, you agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
⚖ Law in the News .com (LITN) Media 📃
Manage Cookie Consent
LITN uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information to provide the best user experience. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Go to mobile version