More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Niagara Falls council contravened Municipal Act in closed-door meeting: Ombudsman

Report cites errors in how in camera meeting to discuss sub-committee to search for new chief administrative officer was handled.

 


PHOTO: Stock

 
 

Niagara Falls city council contravened provincial law when it went into a closed-door meeting in November of 2020 to discuss forming a new sub-committee as part of the search for a new chief administrative officer, Ontario Ombudsman Paul Dubé has ruled.

In a report dated March 15, Dubé said the closed session — also known in municipal government terms as in camera — did not fit with any exception that the Ontario Municipal Act allows to go behind closed doors.

Dubé also said council failed to properly describe the subject to be discussed in camera. Council also contravened the Act when it passed a resolution to go in camera because the passing of that resolution wasn’t seen by the public because city hall was closed to the public due to the pandemic, and that portion of a live meeting wasn’t broadcast, the Ombudsman said.

Dubé said his office received a complaint about the closed meeting to discuss the chief administrative officer hiring sub-committee, which he determined was held on Nov. 17, 2020 before a regular meeting of council.

Council was searching for a new CAO to replace outgoing CAO Ken Todd, who retired in June of last year. It later hired Jason Burgess for the role.

In camera meetings are typically held to discuss legal, personnel and property issues.

Dubé said in the case his office investigated, sub-committee members were announced during the open council meeting on Jan. 19, 2021, but Dubé noted the video recording of the meeting showed two council members indicated they weren’t aware of the requirement to express an interest in serving on the sub-committee prior to the open meeting.

Mayor Jim Diodati said in response that the sub-committee had already been discussed “a couple of times” in camera. Another council member confirmed having discussed the matter “some time in the fall,” Dubé’s report said.

The report said because city hall was closed due to the pandemic, the public couldn’t attend that meeting in person. The agenda noted it would broadcast on the city’s YouTube channel and Facebook page, and on the local cable TV station.

That agenda indicated a link to a proposed resolution saying council would hold a closed-door session before the regular, open council meeting to talk about proposed land acquisition or disposition, and labour relations involving a bargaining update.

Once in closed session, staff provided council with a presentation about the CAO recruitment process, said Dubé.

He said people interviewed by his office said that during the closed session council talked about the proposed mandate of the sub-committee, the number of members, screening processes and the anticipated number of interviews to be conducted. No decisions about the composition of the sub-committee were made at the meeting, Dubé said.

Dubé said people interviewed also said Diodati instructed councillors to express to him in writing their interest in being on the sub-committee. But Dubé said that wasn’t captured on the audio recording, and said his staff didn’t receive any evidence confirming the timing of the mayor’s statement.

CAO sub-committee members included Diodati and councillors Vince Kerrio, Victor Pietrangelo and Wayne Thomson.

Dubé, whose office interviewed all nine members of council, said the investigation faced no roadblocks. “We received full co-operation in this matter,” he said.

Dubé ruled that while “labour relations” can qualify for closed-door discussions under the legislation, that doesn’t apply if the matter to be discussed doesn’t focus on a specific person but instead is about a recruitment process generally as was the case of the CAO search sub-committee meeting.

“The closed meeting discussion did not fit within any of the other exceptions contained in the act and should have occurred in open session,” he wrote.

Council also failed to properly describe the subject to be discussed in closed session in its resolution to proceed in camera, and said the Act was also contravened when the resolution to go in camera was done with no members of the public present or able to observe via live broadcast, Dubé said.

In response to an earlier version of the report, the city said it needed to discuss its plans for CAO recruitment in camera because the information was sensitive and could have compromised the city’s competitive position with other municipalities in terms of finding a new CAO, said Dubé.

While there may have been a desire to maintain confidentiality in order to protect interests of the city, council isn’t allowed to bring a matter behind closed doors simply because it considered it confidential or potentially against the city’s interests to discuss it publicly, he said.

Dubé made several recommendations including that council members be “vigilant” in adhering to the Municipal Act, that only matters that qualify under the Act be discussed behind closed doors, and that any resolutions to proceed in camera are passed in open session and recorded in meeting minutes as well as being captured by live broadcast.

Dubé said that under the Municipal Act, city council is required to pass a resolution stating how it intends to address his report.

 
Paul Forsyth is a veteran of more than 30 years of community journalism who covers a wide range of issues in Niagara Falls and other parts of south Niagara, as well as topics of regional significance in Niagara.
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

 


PHOTO: Stock

 
 

Niagara Falls city council contravened provincial law when it went into a closed-door meeting in November of 2020 to discuss forming a new sub-committee as part of the search for a new chief administrative officer, Ontario Ombudsman Paul Dubé has ruled.

In a report dated March 15, Dubé said the closed session — also known in municipal government terms as in camera — did not fit with any exception that the Ontario Municipal Act allows to go behind closed doors.

Dubé also said council failed to properly describe the subject to be discussed in camera. Council also contravened the Act when it passed a resolution to go in camera because the passing of that resolution wasn’t seen by the public because city hall was closed to the public due to the pandemic, and that portion of a live meeting wasn’t broadcast, the Ombudsman said.

Dubé said his office received a complaint about the closed meeting to discuss the chief administrative officer hiring sub-committee, which he determined was held on Nov. 17, 2020 before a regular meeting of council.

Council was searching for a new CAO to replace outgoing CAO Ken Todd, who retired in June of last year. It later hired Jason Burgess for the role.

In camera meetings are typically held to discuss legal, personnel and property issues.

Dubé said in the case his office investigated, sub-committee members were announced during the open council meeting on Jan. 19, 2021, but Dubé noted the video recording of the meeting showed two council members indicated they weren’t aware of the requirement to express an interest in serving on the sub-committee prior to the open meeting.

Mayor Jim Diodati said in response that the sub-committee had already been discussed “a couple of times” in camera. Another council member confirmed having discussed the matter “some time in the fall,” Dubé’s report said.

The report said because city hall was closed due to the pandemic, the public couldn’t attend that meeting in person. The agenda noted it would broadcast on the city’s YouTube channel and Facebook page, and on the local cable TV station.

That agenda indicated a link to a proposed resolution saying council would hold a closed-door session before the regular, open council meeting to talk about proposed land acquisition or disposition, and labour relations involving a bargaining update.

Once in closed session, staff provided council with a presentation about the CAO recruitment process, said Dubé.

He said people interviewed by his office said that during the closed session council talked about the proposed mandate of the sub-committee, the number of members, screening processes and the anticipated number of interviews to be conducted. No decisions about the composition of the sub-committee were made at the meeting, Dubé said.

Dubé said people interviewed also said Diodati instructed councillors to express to him in writing their interest in being on the sub-committee. But Dubé said that wasn’t captured on the audio recording, and said his staff didn’t receive any evidence confirming the timing of the mayor’s statement.

CAO sub-committee members included Diodati and councillors Vince Kerrio, Victor Pietrangelo and Wayne Thomson.

Dubé, whose office interviewed all nine members of council, said the investigation faced no roadblocks. “We received full co-operation in this matter,” he said.

Dubé ruled that while “labour relations” can qualify for closed-door discussions under the legislation, that doesn’t apply if the matter to be discussed doesn’t focus on a specific person but instead is about a recruitment process generally as was the case of the CAO search sub-committee meeting.

“The closed meeting discussion did not fit within any of the other exceptions contained in the act and should have occurred in open session,” he wrote.

Council also failed to properly describe the subject to be discussed in closed session in its resolution to proceed in camera, and said the Act was also contravened when the resolution to go in camera was done with no members of the public present or able to observe via live broadcast, Dubé said.

In response to an earlier version of the report, the city said it needed to discuss its plans for CAO recruitment in camera because the information was sensitive and could have compromised the city’s competitive position with other municipalities in terms of finding a new CAO, said Dubé.

While there may have been a desire to maintain confidentiality in order to protect interests of the city, council isn’t allowed to bring a matter behind closed doors simply because it considered it confidential or potentially against the city’s interests to discuss it publicly, he said.

Dubé made several recommendations including that council members be “vigilant” in adhering to the Municipal Act, that only matters that qualify under the Act be discussed behind closed doors, and that any resolutions to proceed in camera are passed in open session and recorded in meeting minutes as well as being captured by live broadcast.

Dubé said that under the Municipal Act, city council is required to pass a resolution stating how it intends to address his report.

 
Paul Forsyth is a veteran of more than 30 years of community journalism who covers a wide range of issues in Niagara Falls and other parts of south Niagara, as well as topics of regional significance in Niagara.

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.

Latest News

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed