More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families
Court refuses to stay wrongful dismissal lawsuit despite arbitration agreement in agency contracts

Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection

Clinic failed to follow proper infection control; former patients had to take tests.

PHOTO: Failure of clinic to follow infection procedure resulted in risk of patients contracting infection.
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has certified a class action proceeding against an endoscopy clinic for anxiety and inconvenience suffered by former patients due to a public health notice of risk of infection stemming from the clinic’s failure to follow infection protocol and prevention practices.

In McGee v. Farazli et al., 2022 ONSC 4105, Dr. Christiane Farazli and C. Farazli Medicine Professional Corporation was an endoscopy clinic found by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) to not follow infection control and prevention practices. Ottawa Public Health (OPH) notified former patients of a possible risk of infection and advised them to be tested for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C.

While several individuals tested positive, OPH was unable to confirm transmission through the clinic. Despite testing negative, Fern McGee sought to amend the class proceeding certification. She sought “compensation for exposure to enhanced risk of infection for the shock, trauma, and inconvenience inherent in responding to the public health notice.”

Farazli opposed the certification. Despite conceding that McGee was a suitable class representative and the case met the identifiable class criterion, they argued that there were no truly common issues and that each member would have to prove both damages and causation, making a global determination of liability unreliable.

The court certified the class proceeding.

Contrary to Farazli’s arguments, the court found that the entire class was affected by the receipt of the notice of risk and the need to take action. The existence and extent of duty of care and whether the failure fell below the standard of care are questions common to all members of the class, said the court.

Another question was whether Farazli was liable for the anxiety, inconvenience, and need to submit blood tests without proof of injury or actual infection. There was some basis to the argument that it was plain and obvious that Farazli’s failure to follow proper procedure triggered a duty-bound response by public health officials, said the court, adding that a class action proceeding wouldl also avoid duplicate findings of fact and legal analysis.

The court concluded that the case was an appropriate case for certification.


Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Latest News


Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


Instagram Feed