fbpx
  • Latest News
  • Trending News
  • All
  • Latest News
  • Featured
  • Industry News
  • Legal Governance
  • Constitutional Law
  • Op-Ed
  • News Archives
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Analysis
  • Bankruptcy Law
  • Consumer Protection Law
  • Cyber Security Law
  • Family Law
  • Disability Law
  • Employment Law
  • Environmental Law
  • Estate Law
  • Housing Law
  • Human Rights Code
  • Immigration Law
  • Insurance Law
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Privacy Law
  • Tax Law
  • Workers Compensation Board
Ontario Labour Relations Board rules union acted properly representing unvaxxed healthcare workers

Ontario Labour Relations Board rules union acted properly representing unvaxxed healthcare workers

January 21, 2022
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

August 9, 2022
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

August 3, 2022
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

August 2, 2022
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years

New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years

August 2, 2022

Defence lawyers threaten job action over Legal Aid Alberta funding

August 1, 2022
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases

The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases

July 29, 2022
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.

SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.

July 29, 2022
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban β€” again

Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban β€” again

July 29, 2022
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit

Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit

July 29, 2022

NBA investigating Philadelphia 76ers for possible tampering

July 29, 2022
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid

The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid

July 28, 2022
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app

Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app

July 28, 2022
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)

Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)

July 26, 2022
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection

Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection

July 26, 2022
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit

The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit

July 26, 2022
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert

Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert

July 25, 2022

Abuse and harassment survivors ‘silenced’ by non-disclosure agreements fight for change to B.C. law

July 23, 2022
The Supreme Court decision on the β€˜Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice

The Supreme Court decision on the β€˜Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice

July 5, 2022
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

July 4, 2022

Why your options may be limited if your employer wants you back in the workplace

July 4, 2022

City directs contractors to reinstate Sikh security guards who lost work due to clean-shaven rule

July 4, 2022
Court refuses to stay wrongful dismissal lawsuit despite arbitration agreement in agency contracts

Court refuses to stay wrongful dismissal lawsuit despite arbitration agreement in agency contracts

July 4, 2022
Why a good lawyer never ignores the court of public opinion

Why a good lawyer never ignores the court of public opinion

July 2, 2022
How will R. Kelly sentence impact other trials? (US)

How will R. Kelly sentence impact other trials? (US)

July 1, 2022
14-year-old charged after fireworks allegedly set off on GO train

14-year-old charged after fireworks allegedly set off on GO train

July 1, 2022
The SCC finds constitutional a new procedure in the CC for deciding if private documents can be used by an accused in a sexual offence trial

The SCC finds constitutional a new procedure in the CC for deciding if private documents can be used by an accused in a sexual offence trial

June 30, 2022
Ontario Court of Appeal asserts jurisdiction in international fraud case

Ontario Court of Appeal asserts jurisdiction in international fraud case

June 30, 2022

Former GTA daycare worker gets no jail time after pleading guilty to assaulting 5 children

June 30, 2022

Supreme Court says expanded rape shield laws are constitutional

June 30, 2022
CRTC Ruling Signals How Bill C-11 Could Be Used To Regulate Internet Content

CRTC Ruling Signals How Bill C-11 Could Be Used To Regulate Internet Content

June 30, 2022
  • ABOUT LITN
  • SUPPORT LITN
  • LEGAL, PRIVACY & POLICY
  • PUBLIC EDUCATION & RESOURCE LINKS
Sunday, August 14, 2022
  • Login
  • Register for a FREE LITN account
βš– Law in the News .com (LITN) Media πŸ“ƒ
  • Latest News
  • Industry News
  • Categories
    • A to C
      • Aboriginal Law
      • Access to Justice (A2J)
      • Administrative Law
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Analysis
      • Animal Law
      • Anti-Corruption Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Arbitration Law
      • Banking and Securities Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Cannibis Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action
      • Commercial Law
      • Constitutional Law
      • Construction Law
      • Consumer Protection Law
      • Contract Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber Security Law
    • D to H
      • Disability Law
      • Editor’s Choice
      • Elder Law
      • Employment Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Entertainment Law
      • Estate Law
      • Family Law
      • Highway Traffic Law
      • Housing Law
      • Human Rights Code
    • I to L
      • Immigration Law
      • Industry News
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • International Law
      • Labour Law
      • Latest News
      • Legal Governance
    • M to Z
      • Medical Law
      • Municipal Law
      • Op-Ed
      • Personal Injury Law
      • Privacy Law
      • Real Estate Law
      • Regulatory Law
      • Tax Law
      • Telecommunications Law
      • Transportation Law
      • Workers Compensation Board
  • Archives
    • 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
    • 2021
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
  • About LITN
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Mission
    • Our Goal
    • Contact Us
    • Support LITN
      • Contribute to LITN Operations
      • Place YOUR Custom Ad on LITN
      • Engage with LITN Sponsored Ads
      • Create a FREE LITN Account
      • Subscribe to the LITN Newsletter
      • Connect, Follow, Like, Retweet and Repost LITN
    • Legal, Privacy and Policy
      • Cookie Policy (CA)
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
  • Public Education and Resource Links
No Result
View All Result
βš– Law in the News .com (LITN) Media πŸ“ƒ
  • Latest News
  • Industry News
  • Categories
    • A to C
      • Aboriginal Law
      • Access to Justice (A2J)
      • Administrative Law
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Analysis
      • Animal Law
      • Anti-Corruption Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Arbitration Law
      • Banking and Securities Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Cannibis Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action
      • Commercial Law
      • Constitutional Law
      • Construction Law
      • Consumer Protection Law
      • Contract Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber Security Law
    • D to H
      • Disability Law
      • Editor’s Choice
      • Elder Law
      • Employment Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Entertainment Law
      • Estate Law
      • Family Law
      • Highway Traffic Law
      • Housing Law
      • Human Rights Code
    • I to L
      • Immigration Law
      • Industry News
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • International Law
      • Labour Law
      • Latest News
      • Legal Governance
    • M to Z
      • Medical Law
      • Municipal Law
      • Op-Ed
      • Personal Injury Law
      • Privacy Law
      • Real Estate Law
      • Regulatory Law
      • Tax Law
      • Telecommunications Law
      • Transportation Law
      • Workers Compensation Board
  • Archives
    • 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
    • 2021
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
  • About LITN
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Mission
    • Our Goal
    • Contact Us
    • Support LITN
      • Contribute to LITN Operations
      • Place YOUR Custom Ad on LITN
      • Engage with LITN Sponsored Ads
      • Create a FREE LITN Account
      • Subscribe to the LITN Newsletter
      • Connect, Follow, Like, Retweet and Repost LITN
    • Legal, Privacy and Policy
      • Cookie Policy (CA)
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
  • Public Education and Resource Links
No Result
View All Result
βš– Law in the News .com (LITN) Media πŸ“ƒ
No Result
View All Result
Home Employment Law

Ontario Labour Relations Board rules union acted properly representing unvaxxed healthcare workers

Employees put on unpaid leave complained that the union wasn't more supportive.

January 21, 2022
Reading Time: 6 mins read
1
A A
0
Ontario Labour Relations Board rules union acted properly representing unvaxxed healthcare workers
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare by Email

PHOTO: Stock Image

  •   Zena Olijnyk, Canadian Lawyer
  • January 21, 2022

OLRB dismissed the case of unvaccinated healthcare workers complaining their union wasn’t supportive.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board recently dismissed the complaint of several unvaccinated healthcare personal support workers who were upset with their union’s position to not aggressively support them in their decision not to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

β€œThe applicants have not established a prima facie case of a breach of the [Labour Relations] Act,” says a decisionΒ released Jan. 10.

β€œFundamentally, the applicants are unhappy about the employer’s COVID-19 vaccination policy and are unhappy that the union has not insulated them from their decision to remain unvaccinated,” OLRB vice-chair Lindsay Lawrence wrote in the decision. β€œThis does not make out a breach of the duty of fair representation.”

In the fall of 2021, the employer, CarePartners, introduced a COVID-19 vaccination policy that required employees to be fully vaccinated by no later than Nov. 30, 2021. An allowance was subsequently made for employees to continue working into January 2022 if they had received one dose of the vaccine by Nov. 29, 2021, and attested that they would receive a second dose by Jan. 19, 2022.

Following the release of the policy, Service Employees International Union, Local 1, the union representing personal support workers at CarePartners (an intervenor in this case), advised its members that it had sought legal advice on the employer’s policy. The advice they received made it clear that β€œgiven the current state of the law and the unprecedented challenges of COVID-19, mandatory vaccination policies will most likely be upheld.”

The union told members they could file a grievance, which would be held in abeyance β€œpending case law,” but it warned that such grievances were unlikely to succeed and that absent a valid exemption, employees who refused to be vaccinated risked discipline or dismissal.

The unhappy employees filed an application against the union on Nov. 24, 2021. At the time the application was filed, the employees anticipated being, but had not yet been, placed on unpaid leave. As a result of the application of the policy, on Nov. 30, 2021, employees Tiffany Bloomfield, Danielle Hurding and Lexi Bezzo were placed on unpaid leave, and the union did file a grievance on their behalf.

The CarePartners policy states that non-compliant employees will be β€œmanaged accordingly, including but not limited to, being placed on an unpaid leave of absence.” As of the date of the consultation, these employees have remained on unpaid leave.

In early January, the labour relations board held a consultation meeting with both parties, who had been advised in December to come to the consultation prepared to make submissions on the union’s request to dismiss the application for failure to disclose a prima facie case. They were also asked to consult recent decisions posted on the board’s website relating to similar issues.

The employees alleged that the union breached the duty of β€œfair representation” as set out under s. 74 of the Labour Relations Act. It says a trade union or council of trade unions β€œshall not act in a manner that is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith in the representation of any of the employees in the unit.”

Under the act, Lawrence wrote, the board cannot dismiss an application for failing to make out a prima facie case β€œunless it is clear, or plain and obvious, that it has no reasonable chance of success for establishing a violation of the act based on the allegations made.”

At the Jan. 5 consultation, the employees alleged:

  • the union had not communicated sufficiently with them and/or had discouraged them from β€œtaking action”
  • the union should have taken steps to challenge the policy before Nov. 30, 2021
  • the union was not taking enough action with respect to the grievance.

In terms of a remedy, the employees wanted the board to force the union to pursue their concerns more forcefully and quickly. β€œThe applicants also asserted that the union should have challenged what they allege was unfairness when the employer allowed employees with one dose extra time for compliance.”

But in this case, Lawrence wrote, β€œit is clear, plain and obvious that the applicants have no reasonable chance of success in establishing a violation of the duty of fair representation.” The application is about the employer’s policy, the applicants’ decision to remain unvaccinated, and their belief that the union should support their position without qualification or question.

Β β€œThis is not an application about the union’s conduct in any way being arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith.”

One of the applicants read a letter at the consultation that expressed her views about the vaccine and various statistics related to the vaccine. However, Lawrence said in her ruling that these complaints are β€œnot about the union’s conduct.”

She cited a recent ruling on a similar issue,Β Tina Di Tommaso v Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation, 2021 CanLII 132009, which stated: β€œA duty of fair representation application is about a union’s conduct in the representation of its members and is β€˜not the forum for debating or complaining about vaccination in general, this vaccine in particular, scientific studies, the government’s directions, and/or a particular employer’s policy.’”

In her own decision, Lawrence ruled β€œto the extent that the applicants seek to challenge the employer’s policy and/or to have the board order the employer to change that policy or provide compensation, a section 74 complaint is simply not the right forum, and those remedies are not available.”

Concerning the union’s communication with its members, Lawrence ruled the employees did not make a prima facie case that the union acted in a manner that was arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith.

β€œThe union made clear to its members the legal advice that it had received and what it had determined to do in response,” Lawrence wrote. β€œThe applicants clearly disagreed with the union’s message, and indeed may have found that message discouraging, but it cannot be said that the union did not communicate and/or was unresponsive to member inquiries about the policy.”

One of the applicants said that she sent an email inquiry to the union, to which she did not receive a reply. However, Lawrence wrote: β€œWhether or not the union responded directly to each and every email, there is no doubt that the union communicated clearly and effectively with members in response to the policy. The union was not required to provide its unvaccinated members with encouragement or a rosy outlook; indeed, it was fair and prudent for the union to provide a clear and frank assessment of the situation based on legal advice received.”

Finally, Lawrence said the board could not conclude that the union breached its fair representation duty in moving the grievance through the procedure set out in the collective agreement. β€œOn its face, a decision to watch β€˜pending case law’ (particularly on an emergent issue and at a time when many arbitration cases are known to be proceeding on vaccination policies across the province) is anything but arbitrary, discriminatory and/or in bad faith.”

She also noted that the union immediately filed a grievance on behalf of the employees who β€œsuffered an adverse employment consequence” by being put on unpaid leave. β€œThere was nothing further that the union could or should have done for them in that regard.”

Labour and employment lawyer Jason Jagpal, with Whitten & Lublin, says that while the decision, in this case, does not resolve any of the broader disputes between employees and employers, unionized or not, over vaccine mandate, it does confirm that the union acted appropriately.

β€œIt is entirely unsurprising that the Labour Board reached this decision – the employees’ complaints related to the imposition of the employer’s policy. The union did what it was required to do.”

Β 


Jason Jagpal

Β 

Furthermore, the union filed a policy grievance when its workers were impacted by being placed on unpaid leave and acted correctly in waiting until then. Based on the legal advice it received, holding the grievance in abeyance β€œwas the most prudent course of action.”

Jagpal notes that had the union not brought a policy grievance, there is the possibility that the Labour Board would have viewed matters differently. However, the labour board deferred to the union’s β€œinformed decision” and won’t β€œcompel a union to ignore legal advice in determining if and when to file a grievance.”

Finally, Jagpal says this decision does not conclusively, in any way, suggest that an unvaccinated employee is not entitled to termination pay. β€œEntitlements to termination pay will develop through future decisions.”
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Unsubscribe from LITN instant notifications
Previous Post

Federal government to spend $8.9M to expand Indigenous justice centres in B.C.

Next Post

Canada planning technological fixes to make crossing the border faster

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.

Latest News

Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Family Law

Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

August 9, 2022
8
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Transportation Law

New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

August 3, 2022
4
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
Antitrust Law

Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

August 2, 2022
17

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed

  • Osgoode - 225th Anniversary πŸŽ†πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‡ | https://lawinthenews.com/
  • Friday humour ... #lawhumour #lawjokes #lawmemes #lightersideofthelaw
  • Osgoode - 225th Anniversary πŸŽ†πŸŽ‰πŸŽ‡ | https://lawinthenews.com/

Facebook Feed

Facebook Feed

Twitter Feed

Join the Conversation

Personal selections from a Canadian perspective. #Law in the #News #LITN @Law_In_The_News

News Categories

Latest Headlines

Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes

August 9, 2022
8
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights

August 3, 2022
4
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)

August 2, 2022
17

Subscribe to the LITN Newsletter

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.

Website Powered By

DJT Design Studios logo

Β© 2022 Law in the News Media (LITN)

  • About LITN
  • Contact LITN
  • Support LITN
  • Legal, Privacy and Policy
  • Public Education & Resource Links
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Latest News
  • Industry News
  • Categories
    • A to C
      • Aboriginal Law
      • Access to Justice (A2J)
      • Administrative Law
      • Alternative Dispute Resolution
      • Analysis
      • Animal Law
      • Arbitration Law
      • Anti-Corruption Law
      • Antitrust Law
      • Banking and Securities Law
      • Bankruptcy Law
      • Cannibis Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Civil Litigation
      • Class Action
      • Commercial Law
      • Constitutional Law
      • Construction Law
      • Consumer Protection Law
      • Contract Law
      • Criminal Law
      • Cyber Security Law
    • D to H
      • Disability Law
      • Editor’s Choice
      • Elder Law
      • Employment Law
      • Environmental Law
      • Estate Law
      • Family Law
      • Highway Traffic Law
      • Housing Law
      • Human Rights Code
    • I to L
      • Immigration Law
      • Industry News
      • Insurance Law
      • Intellectual Property Law
      • International Law
      • Labour Law
      • Latest News
      • Legal Governance
    • M to Z
      • Medical Law
      • Municipal Law
      • Op-Ed
      • Personal Injury Law
      • Privacy Law
      • Real Estate Law
      • Regulatory Law
      • Tax Law
      • Telecommunications Law
      • Transportation Law
      • Workers Compensation Board
  • News Archives
    • 2022
      • July 2022
      • June 2022
      • May 2022
      • April 2022
      • March 2022
      • February 2022
      • January 2022
    • 2021
      • December 2021
      • November 2021
      • October 2021
      • September 2021
      • August 2021
  • Public Education & Resource Links
  • About LITN
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Our Mission
    • Our Goal
    • Contact LITN
    • Support LITN
    • Legal, Privacy and Policy
      • Home
      • Cookie Policy
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Use Policy

Β© 2022 Law in the News Media (LITN)

Welcome Back to LITN!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your LITN account below.

Forgot your password? Sign Up

Create a FREE LITN Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Please complete your registration below.

*By registering into the website, you agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
βš– Law in the News .com (LITN) Media πŸ“ƒ
Manage Cookie Consent
LITN uses technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information to provide the best user experience. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Go to mobile version