More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Ottawa appeals Quebec court decision finding parts of Indigenous child welfare law unconstitutional

Federal government is taking its case to the Supreme Court of Canada.

 


PHOTO: Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller and Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu are looking for direction from Canada's top court on Indigenous child welfare. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

 
 

The federal government is pursuing an appeal at Canada’s highest court over the constitutionality of its landmark Indigenous child welfare legislation.

The move comes after the Quebec Court of Appeal ruled last month that parts of C-92 are unconstitutional.

In a statement, Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu, Justice Minister David Lametti and Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller said they take issue with the court’s conclusion that sections 21 and 22(3) of the act are invalid.

Those sections allow Indigenous child welfare laws to override provincial laws where they conflict.

“The Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision raises important questions regarding how communities can implement their jurisdiction over child and family services without being unduly impeded by provincial laws,” they said.

“We look forward to the Supreme Court of Canada’s direction on the best approach to ensuring that Indigenous communities can effectively exercise their jurisdiction, unencumbered by conflicting laws.”

C-92 overhauls the way First Nations, Inuit and Métis children are to be treated in the Indigenous child welfare system.

It states, for example, that when looking to place kids in foster care, authorities are to prioritize extended family and home communities.

The law also allows communities to create their own foster care laws, which are to take effect after the federal government receives a year’s notice.

The Quebec government referred the legislation to Quebec’s highest court as a constitutional question.

Although the Quebec Court of Appeal found parts of the legislation problematic, it became the first court to recognize that Indigenous Peoples have a constitutionally-protected right of self-government — an aspect of the decision the federal ministers applauded.

Olivia Stefanovich is a senior reporter for CBC’s Parliamentary Bureau based in Ottawa. She previously worked in Toronto, Saskatchewan and northern Ontario. Connect with her on Twitter at @CBCOlivia. Story tips welcome: olivia.stefanovich@cbc.ca.

GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

 


PHOTO: Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller and Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu are looking for direction from Canada's top court on Indigenous child welfare. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

 
 

The federal government is pursuing an appeal at Canada’s highest court over the constitutionality of its landmark Indigenous child welfare legislation.

The move comes after the Quebec Court of Appeal ruled last month that parts of C-92 are unconstitutional.

In a statement, Indigenous Services Minister Patty Hajdu, Justice Minister David Lametti and Crown-Indigenous Relations Minister Marc Miller said they take issue with the court’s conclusion that sections 21 and 22(3) of the act are invalid.

Those sections allow Indigenous child welfare laws to override provincial laws where they conflict.

“The Quebec Court of Appeal’s decision raises important questions regarding how communities can implement their jurisdiction over child and family services without being unduly impeded by provincial laws,” they said.

“We look forward to the Supreme Court of Canada’s direction on the best approach to ensuring that Indigenous communities can effectively exercise their jurisdiction, unencumbered by conflicting laws.”

C-92 overhauls the way First Nations, Inuit and Métis children are to be treated in the Indigenous child welfare system.

It states, for example, that when looking to place kids in foster care, authorities are to prioritize extended family and home communities.

The law also allows communities to create their own foster care laws, which are to take effect after the federal government receives a year’s notice.

The Quebec government referred the legislation to Quebec’s highest court as a constitutional question.

Although the Quebec Court of Appeal found parts of the legislation problematic, it became the first court to recognize that Indigenous Peoples have a constitutionally-protected right of self-government — an aspect of the decision the federal ministers applauded.

Olivia Stefanovich is a senior reporter for CBC’s Parliamentary Bureau based in Ottawa. She previously worked in Toronto, Saskatchewan and northern Ontario. Connect with her on Twitter at @CBCOlivia. Story tips welcome: olivia.stefanovich@cbc.ca.

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.

Latest News

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed