More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

Pandemic not an excuse to default on settlement agreement: court

No rational link between the pandemic and failure to comply with obligation.

PHOTO: Stock

The Ontario Court of Appeal has rejected the defense that the COVID-19 pandemic altered a party’s obligation under a settlement agreement.

In 1504641 Ontario Inc. v. 2225902 Ontario Inc., 2022 ONCA 175, the parties, two incorporated entities, entered into a Minutes of Settlement where the appellants agreed to pay the respondents $40,000 in four monthly instalments of $10,000 each. Pending the completion of their instalment payments, the appellants also agreed to deliver a consent to judgment in the amount of $120,000 to be held in escrow, as well as a consent to the dismissal of the action without costs to be held in escrow by counsel for two other defendants.

However, the COVID-19 pandemic started shortly after the parties entered into the agreement. The appellants failed to deliver the required consents and stopped payment on their last instalment. As a result, the respondents arranged separately for the dismissal of the action against the other defendants.

The respondents also brought a motion to enforce the Minutes of Settlement against the appellants. The judge granted a summary judgment in the amount of $90,000, which was equivalent to the amount held in escrow less the three instalments previously paid by the appellants.

The appellants claimed that the pandemic or the respondents’ arrangements with the other defendants should alter the appellants’ obligations under the Minutes of Settlement. They further claimed that the judge made an error in dealing with the motion as a motion for judgment, rather than as an in-writing motion, and in converting it to a summary judgment motion.

The court disagreed, ruling that the pandemic or the respondents’ arrangements with the other defendants did not alter the appellants’ obligations. The motion judge observed that the appellants did not “advance any grounds, much less evidence, [to support] a rational link between the pandemic and their failure to comply with the terms of the Minutes of Settlement,” the appeal court said.

Furthermore, the court concluded that, due to the failure of the appellants to deliver the consent to the dismissal of the action, the respondents were obliged to make other arrangements to dismiss the action against the other settling defendants. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal with costs payable to the respondents.


Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to LITN's Terms & Conditions.

Latest News


Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


Instagram Feed