More than 10,000 Canadians received a medically-assisted death in 2021: report
Quebec Superior Court suspends Bill 96’s translation requirement until constitutionality determined
The Ontario government has given Maggie an ultimatum: the disabled teen can lose her funding or her independence
FBI took 11 sets of classified material from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home while investigating possible Espionage Act violations (US)
Ontario class action settlement reclassifies volunteers as employees, setting new precedent
Availability of Judicial Review in SABS Disputes
Are masking policies still valid?
Justice Canada releases commission report on impact of lack of legal aid in family law disputes
Harmonized sales tax part of maximum amount of attendant care benefits owed by insurer: court
New rules coming next month to help Canadians with cancelled and delayed flights
Stephen King set to testify for govt in books merger trial (US)
New law program in Quebec to begin next fall, a first in 50 years
The Impact of the Lack of Legal Aid in Family Law Cases
SCC rules that when someone is required by their partner to wear a condom but do not, they could be guilty of sexual assault.
Big Plastic suing feds over single-use ban — again
Tim Hortons offers coffee and doughnut as proposed settlement in class action lawsuit
The SCC has refused to hear the appeal to declare the renewal of the state of health emergency by the Quebec government invalid
Federal privacy commissioner investigating controversial ArriveCAN app
Kraken, a U.S. Crypto Exchange, Is Suspected of Violating Sanctions (US)
Ontario court certifies class action on former patients’ anxiety from notice of risk of infection
The stakes couldn’t be higher as Canada’s top court decides whether to hear climate class action lawsuit
Professor Barnali Choudhury selected by EU as trade and sustainable development expert
The Supreme Court decision on the ‘Ghomeshi’ amendments will help sexual assault victims access justice
AFN Reaches $20 B Final Settlement Agreement to Compensate First Nations Children and Families

The small claims system is in disarray and it is depriving many of access to justice

Small claims court once allowed former employees to pursue damages against their employer in a timely, cost-effective manner. Not anymore.

 
PHOTO: For employees who don’t earn hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, the small claims system used to be a viable option to file a wrongful dismissal claim for up to $35,000. PHOTO BY GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOTO
 
 
For employees who don’t earn hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, the small claims system used to be a viable option to file a wrongful dismissal claim for up to $35,000.

For employees who don’t earn hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, the small claims system used to be a viable option to file a wrongful dismissal claim for up to $35,000 (in Ontario, for example). Following the filing of a defence, a settlement conference in front of a judge could be heard within three months and, if necessary, the matter could be set down for trial after paying a $100 fee.

Small claims trials can be run by paralegals, articling students, or even the plaintiffs themselves. We have often recommended to plaintiffs with small cases that they take on the cases themselves or, if a little larger, use one of our articling students. This alternative allowed former employees to pursue damages against their employer in a timely, cost-effective manner.

This all changed following the COVID-19 pandemic. Take, for example, a small claims court matter one of our juniors is defending for one of our employer clients. We were served the plaintiff’s claim in August of 2020. We delivered our defence in September of 2020. As of today, we have yet to receive any notification of a settlement conference, and do not expect to receive one this year. No other action has been taken on the file. The plaintiff’s third representative recently reached out to introduce themselves, as the previous representatives had moved on from the law firm. The plaintiff in this matter will likely not see any recovery for at least another two years. For an employee terminated during the pandemic, is it reasonable for them to have wait three to four years to recover damages? There is no mandatory mediation in small claims court. Settlement conferences scheduled by the court are often the only step between the filing of a defence and a trial.

Some lawyers have taken the approach of tacking on $100,000 in punitive or bad faith damages (without merit) in order to bring a small claims matter in Superior Court. We recently received a claim for a minimum-wage employee who was terminated for around $25,000 in wrongful dismissal damages, and another $100,000 in punitive and bad faith damages. What these firms do not consider (and do their poor clients know?) is that if they obtain less than $35,000 in Superior Court after the legal fees, even if they win, they will presumptively be deprived of any costs so will have legal fees vastly exceeding their recovery.

Not only is this an employment law issue, but this court backlog has also now turned into an access to justice issue. A non-functioning small claims court system effectively deprives a significant section of the population from accessing affordable legal services. The backlog is also forcing claims that should have been brought in small claims court into Superior Court, mistakenly as we stated, but further clogging up those courts. Young lawyers and articling students are unable to gain the valuable experience they would normally receive from frequent attendance at various hearings in different levels of court.

With the availability of Zoom hearings, one would expect the courts to be operating at a record pace. But with a shortage of judges to attend those hearings, the court backlogs are being exacerbated.

Inadvertently, this has become a boon for employers facing actions in small claims court. They can take solace in knowing that it will be years before any matter is heard and be forced to pay damages, assuming the employee has the tenacity to persist. They can now afford to take hard stances against employees who have filed in small claims court, freeing up cash flow in the interim. They will likely have found new employment and possibly, lose interest in their claims well before any court date comes available.

Howard Levitt is senior partner of Levitt Sheikh, employment and labour lawyers with offices in Toronto and Hamilton. He practices employment law in eight provinces. He is the author of six books including the Law of Dismissal in Canada. Puneet Tiwari is with Levitt Sheikh.


 
GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Want direct access to the latest LITN content?

Stay in the loop ➞ Subscribe to LITN instant notifications.
Receive the latest content delivered directly to your device.
Unsubscribe at anytime.

Latest News

Subscribe

Join the LITN Newsletter ➞ the latest news delivered to your inbox. Unsubscribe at any time.


GOOGLE ADVERTISEMENT

Instagram Feed